The possibility of bias using peer review

Author: jgjw

August undefined, 2024

Webbjournals—high-quality journals use strong peer-review systems” (Bordage and Caelleigh, 2001, p. 904). Correspondingly, publications “are not held in high esteem if they do not first ... possibility of bias. Types of bias relevant to … Webbpp. 96 – 132 Abstract Read online Read online Abstract In this study, we explore the possibility of bias in the article evaluation process during peer review, due to homogeneous groups of reviewers, most of whom belong to the same professional field.

Three ways to combat peer review bias Jisc

Webb13 aug. 2024 · Traditionally, machine learning algorithms relied on reliable labels from experts to build predictions. More recently however, algorithms have been receiving data from the general population in the form of labeling, annotations, etc. The result is that algorithms are subject to bias that is born from ingesting unchecked information, such … Webbstudies of bias in peer review are relatively old and it is not clear whether or how far biases detected in the past have been affected by changes in social attitudes. In response to these concerns, we analyze data for the peer review systems used in Frontiers (an open access publishing house which uses a novel interactive review process ... fisher louisiana

Revisiting Bias in Qualitative Research: Reflections on Its ...

Webb21 apr. 2024 · An audit of bias in performance reviews at a midsized law firm found sobering differences by both race and gender. The authors identified four patterns of bias in the evaluations and recommended ... WebbPeer review is the major method used by the scientific community to evaluate manuscripts and decide what is suitable for publication. However, this process in its current design is … fisherloveyou

Unconscious Bias in Peer Review - Clinical Gastroenterology and …

Peer-review and publication does not guarantee reliable …

WebbHalo Effect in Peer Review: Exploring the Possibility of Bias Associated with the Feeling of Belonging to a Group José Osvaldo De Sordi; Manuel Antonio Meireles Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, v.24, n.3, p.96-132, jul/set. 2024 99 effect in the review of these articles. Identifying a journal with all the Webb10 dec. 2012 · Abstract. Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of … fisher lower school detroitWebbpeer feedback, peer review or peer evaluation. Formative assessment is based on the process of learning and focuses on progress, rather than results, which is the focus of summative assessment (Hedge, 2000). Formative assessment can be performed by oneself, a teacher, or a peer, and in this case it is the feedback from peers that is in focus. fisher lower magnet academy

"Webb13 maj 2015 · There were 4 RCTs testing the effects of revealing the peer reviewers’ identities (6, 14, 16, 17), and 1 study comparing a journal that uses single-blind peer review with one that reveals author and peer reviewer names, publishing the peer review report as part of the pre-publication history of articles accepted in the journal (9 – available in an … " - The possibility of bias using peer review

The possibility of bias using peer review

Bias in peer review - Lee - 2013 - Wiley Online Library

Webb13 dec. 2016 · The incident brought back into limelight the loopholes in one of the pillars of academic publishing process: peer review. Peer review is regarded as the gold standard for research evaluation. However, it has been consistently targeted and manipulated by researchers, and, at times, even editors. Peer review is the stepping stone to publication ... Webb1 jan. 2009 · Connected to this hypothesis is the possibility of cognitive bias in peer review. If academics tend to give higher scores to research with which the reviewer has a cognitive similarity there is a ...

Did you know?

Webb26 okt. 2024 · The peer review reports summarized the strengths and weaknesses of the paper. Moreover, they did not include a recommendation for accepting or rejecting the … Webb27 maj 2016 · PHOTO: AAAS/ EPNAC.COM. Open in viewer. Deeply rooted assumptions creep into decision-making in unrecognized ways—even among the most well-intentioned peer-reviewers, journal editors, and science funders—and that can prevent the best science from being sponsored or published, experts said at a recent AAAS forum on implicit bias.

Webb6 jan. 2024 · FS: To the best of my knowledge, this is the first research on gender bias in peer review using complete data on manuscripts submitted to journals in different fields of research. As we have explained in another paper published in 2024 in Nature . . . research on peer review is generally limited to individual journals or a small number of journals … WebbThe literature indicates the occurrence of bias in article reviews especially in the editor review due to the perception of the quality of the article (halo effect) due to the characteristics of the authors, especially the author’s name and affiliation (PETERS; CECI, 1982 PETERS, D. P.; CECI, S. J. Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate …

Webb1 jan. 2009 · Research on bias in peer review examines scholarly communication and funding processes to assess the epistemic and social legitimacy of the mechanisms by … Webb13 jan. 2024 · PeerJudge can help predict the overall reviewer decision and whether a paper will be ‘approved’, ‘approved with reservations’ or ‘not approved’. If further developed, the tool could be useful to notify reviewers that their peer review report and overall judgment are potentially inconsistent. It could help with journal reviewing ...

Webb1 apr. 2024 · Various types of bias and confounding have been described in the biomedical literature that can affect a study before, during, or after the intervention has been …

Webb7 mars 2024 · Possible Biases in Peer Evaluations: Despite peer evaluations being a better way in which people in the same organization would evaluate each other based on their … fisher love bird for saleWebb1 apr. 2024 · Peer review bias can be defined as a violation of impartiality in the evaluation of a submission. 8 We propose that this transgression of neutrality standards can affect … fisher loy lafayette inWebb29 maj 2009 · Friday, May 29, 2009. In a significant decision, the New Jersey Appellate Division has recognized the “subordinate bias” theory, which provides a plaintiff an opportunity to prevail on a ... canadian scotch subscriptionWebb3 jan. 2024 · Consider potential bias while constructing the interview and order the questions suitably. Ask general questions first, before moving to specific or sensitive questions. Leading questions and wording bias. Questions that lead or prompt the participants in the direction of probable outcomes may result in biased answers. fisher lp-31Webb19 jan. 2002 · Readers of medical literature need to consider two types of validity, internal and external. Internal validity means that the study measured what it set out to; external validity is the ability to generalise from the study to the reader's patients. With respect to internal validity, selection bias, information bias, and confounding are present to some … fisher lower academyWebbAbstract In this study, we explore the possibility of bias in the article evaluation process during peer review, due to homogeneous groups of reviewers,... DOAJ is a unique and … fisher lpaWebbMost studies in this review did not have a long-term intervention or follow-up; hence, adverse effects, including mortality, with chronic use of these drugs could not be assessed. Many studies assessed the outcome using self-rated scales, leading to self-report bias and giving their perception about improvement instead of the exact findings. canadian scrapbook companies